E-mail marketing. Reflections on timing.

In a previous post on this blog, we already discussed e-mail marketing as still being a valid marketing channel. In that post we made a clear distinction between e-mail marketing and spam. Additionally, when you are not sending out spam but deploy e-mail blast software in cooperation with intelligent marketing techniques, one needs to realize that timing is a rather crucial aspect as well.

Timing e-mail marketing

Timing e-mail marketing

When does the message appear in front of the receiver?

Feature story : e-mail blasts from political parties

Today, a few minutes ago, I went voting. Back at home I checked my e-mail inbox: 3 commercial e-mails from political parties in order to get my vote in the last minutes of the campaign. Sorry, too late! I voted after which I read your e-mail. Nevertheless, you had about 2 or 3 months to reach me via e-mail. You didn’t. Timing is almost as crucial as targeting the right audience. Wrong timing is a classical example of deploying e-mail marketing non-effectively.

Other reflections on the timing aspect of e-mail blasts

  • E-mails on Monday: if people take a day off, it’s probably a monday… So, if you want your e-mail not to be read, send it on monday.
  • E-mails on Monday – part 2: people open their mailbox after not opening it for an entire weekend. Your e-mail is in a clutter of loads of e-mails. Are you that sure yours it the one that’s going to be read?
  • E-mail campaigns on Friday: if people take a day off, it’s probably on Friday … or on Monday
  • E-mail hour of sending: I believe e-mails have the highest change of being read when send on Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday. Additionally one needs to realize that people want a small break from now and then while working. Don’t you feel like reading something amusing when you’re close to lunch break? Yes, I suggest that sending out e-mail blast shortly before noon is the most fruitful period of the day.

Share

On the oil spill: BP to deploy SEM techniques for reputation management

BP deploys SEM techniques for reputation management

BP deploys SEM techniques for reputation management

BP: attack on nature and mankind?

You might have heard about it: there’s an oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. BP – held responsible for this disaster – is doing everything within its reach to solve the issue as soon as possible. Instead of discussing the engineering operations by which the company is trying to stop the leak, I want to say a word or two about the marketing (public relations) aspects that come into play.

Reputation at risk.

Needless to say that a natural disaster can seriously harm the reputation of a company – resulting in fewer “likers” (cfr: the Facebook like hype on external websites…) or even less people willing to fill up their car at a BP service station. For BP this is as much a disaster as is the oil for the nature and our planet. BP can’t afford to have a decrease in revenue – the cost of the oil spill is already sufficiently high.

Reputation management: what is the reputation?

One could think of BP as a “money-making machine while destroying our planet”. One could think that is correct – but it’s not. In the past – as well as today – BP has been glorified for its environmentally responsible business model. Yes, BP is not just about oil. BP is about: oil, natural gas, wind, solar, biofuels, efficiency, energy security, energy diversity, …

SEM techniques as a means for reputation management

SEM stands for search engine marketing. It is the “art” of positioning website pages in the Google query result pages. One can pay Google to be on the result pages. You’ll end up in the “sponsored links” and pay each time somebody clicks your link. This type of search engine marketing  is called SEA: search engine advertising. An other approach is to build your website in such a way that it organically (without paying Google) lists well in the search results. This type of SEM is called SEO: search engine optimization. The latter is more sustainable than the first, but takes more time to prove its efficiency.

In order to understand the point, one needs to know a bit more about “the psychology of Google result pages”.

  • people usually look no further than the results displayed on page 1
  • people believe that they receive good information via this technology – and they actually do !
  • people believe the “best” companies are  at the top of the list
  • Google has become the number 1 source for people to obtain information.

Is SEM a powerful reputation management technique?

SEM, both SEA and SEO, are valid reputation management techniques. As a matter of fact, companies should consider thinking about this aspect not only when dealing with so-called crisis communication.
SEO: long-term reputation management?

What if the first Google result page of your company’s brand name is entirely filled with webpages that you own or that you have relations with? Well, then you would control your reputation when people search for you. How to handle that? Well, just think on the following set-up: index your company (product) specific website in Google, make a Facebook page as well, set up a blog, deploy a twitter account, etc. You’ll note that after a while when people browse your company or product they see pages in Google that are managed by yourself. The reputation that develops in people’s minds is completely under your control.

Why BP ran an SEA campaign

As stated above, SEA is a means to appear in the listing with a finger flick while SEO takes time to have impact. For this reason BP had to run an SEA campaign on the keywords ‘Oil Spill’. Is it wrong to do so? Actually no, it’s not because they paid for inclusion that it is immoral to do so. As a matter of fact, nobody would have questioned BP buying a newspaper page in order to put an ad for e.g. apologies about the oil spill (they might even have done so).

Finally, a word about BP.

Looking at the BP case, we have to admit that they are quite committed to the environment. We see that the engineering operations are doing everything to get the leak fixed as soon as possible. This is also what they want to make clear to the general public. However, if they had deployed a more extensive reputation management strategy before the disaster… it would have been more powerful and people wouldn’t have questioned the adwords campaign that much. Nevertheless: BP is environmentally responsible. They just had a little bad luck with their operations on the Gulf of Mexico…

Special reputation management pages on BP.com

Special reputation management pages on BP.com

Live stream of operations at Gulf of Mexico

Live stream of operations at Gulf of Mexico

BP's environmentally responsible business program - not specifically related to the leak!

BP's environmentally responsible business program - not specifically related to the leak!

Share

Belgian election fever: reflections on extremism and their outdoor print ads.

Election in Belgium

Election in Belgium

Belgium is heading towards elections

Regardless of the fact that we are facing elections again in Belgium, I want to discuss the outdoor print poster of the right extremist party. For your information, they’re very nationalist. They rather see the northern (dutch-speaking) part of the country become a separate state instead of cooperating with the southern (french-speaking) part. Their driving factors are: a different language, a differently organized economic structure, money that flows from the north to the south, etc.

Language at the core of the party program

As stated above, language is a major point in their (ehrm) “ideology”. So they state in their posters: “Flemish people first” – written as “Vlamingen 1st”.

Problems with this statement

Either they make a dutch spelling mistake or they introduce English (1st, means first) into their campaign… Isn’t this a bit strange for a party who has Dutch language at the core of its existence? The ambiguity is clear to me…Empowering the stupidity of the right-wing.

A situation where I could have understand this approach

I could have understand this poster without worrying when the party had received list number 1 for the election. From a marketing point of view, the big 1 would have made clear that they were the first party on the election sheet. Nonetheless, they are not. They received number 7. The irony in here is that number 1 was granted to the flemish social-democrats – their ideologic counterpart.

Share